12/31/1997
TP claimed that the department should not have assessed penalty on receipts from sales to out-of-state buyers. TP claimed to be non-negligent because they relied on regulation 3 NMAC 2.55.12.2 and Ruling 450-89-10. Protest denied.
TP claimed that the department should not have assessed penalty on receipts from sales to out-of-state buyers. TP claimed to be non-negligent because they relied on regulation 3 NMAC 2.55.12.2 and Ruling 450-89-10. Protest denied.